01
Define
Approve the study before drafting
Turn a topic, brief or existing document into a study specification that keeps questions, objectives, variables and methods aligned.
A connected workspace for serious research
From research idea to review-ready work, in one connected system.
Plan your study, manage evidence, analyse data, write proposals, theses and journal articles, apply institution or journal requirements, and verify quality without losing context between tools.
Research decisions stay visible One connected project context Reviewable, versioned workflows
Active project
Study approvedDigital strategy and SME performance
Evidence42screened sources
AnalysisReadydesign mapped
Requirements1reviewed profile
Connected research context
Research questions aligned
Variables and constructs mapped
Evidence provenance retained
Analysis outputs approved
Applied requirement profile
University thesis handbookMaster's · Business School · Version 3
Structure checkedCitation style setExport rules retained
Versioned profiles
Evidence provenance
Deterministic analysis
Research quality checks
DOCX inspection
The problem
Research breaks down when every tool works in isolation.
A polished paragraph is not enough when the study design, evidence, analysis, requirements and final document contradict one another.
01
Research questions drift away from objectives.
02
Methods and analysis stop matching the approved design.
03
Citations lose their connection to the underlying evidence.
04
Institutional requirements are checked only at the end.
05
Each revision creates another conflicting document version.
EthosWrite keeps one approved project context.
Changes made at the study level can flow through evidence, analysis, writing, review and export.
Connected workflow
One research context. Every stage connected.
Use the tools you need without turning the project into a collection of unrelated prompts and files.
02
Evidence
Build a traceable source base
Search, screen and retain academic evidence with provenance, source context and decisions that remain visible during writing.
03
Analyse
Run analysis that fits the design
Map variables, review assumptions, execute supported methods and carry approved results consistently into the manuscript.
04
Write
Draft the right research output
Create proposals, theses, full papers, articles, systematic reviews and targeted sections from the same approved context.
05
Review
Resolve weaknesses with visible controls
Use supervisor, editor and quality workflows to inspect evidence, methodology, citations, revisions and publication readiness.
06
Export
Deliver requirement-aware documents
Apply reviewed profiles, verify references and layout, then export a controlled DOCX with the relevant quality evidence.
Requirement intelligence
Use the requirements that actually govern your work.
Upload a university handbook, journal author guide, DOCX or searchable PDF, or paste the applicable instructions. Review the extracted rules, save the profile and reuse the approved version across projects.
Proposal, thesis, dissertation and journal profiles
Academic level, department and programme applicability
Human review before a profile governs writing or export
Immutable versions and source evidence retained
Uploaded sourcePDF · 28 pages
Chapter structure and submission format
Draft profile
Review requiredDocument typeMaster's thesis
Citation styleAPA 7
Section order9 required parts
Line spacing1.5
Review, version and apply to a project
Built for the research ecosystem
One platform, with the right controls for each role.
Individual researchers can work independently while supervisors and institutions gain durable review and governance workflows.
Keep every part of the study working from the same research decisions.
Move from proposal to thesis, article or systematic review without rebuilding the context each time. Reuse approved evidence, analysis and requirement profiles across the project.
Proposal, thesis and article workflows
Versioned requirement profiles
Section repair and controlled export
Research integrity
AI assistance with visible research controls.
EthosWrite is designed to support research judgement, not conceal uncertainty or replace researcher review.
Evidence remains attributable
Sources, profile versions and key research decisions retain provenance rather than disappearing into an opaque prompt.
Analysis remains connected
Approved results and diagnostics can flow into writing without silently replacing the underlying statistical evidence.
Quality issues stay visible
Missing evidence, unresolved conflicts and publication defects are surfaced for review instead of being presented as certainty.
Access follows the workspace
Personal profiles, project resources and institutional tenant data follow explicit ownership and access controls.
Responsible-use boundaryResearchers review generated work before it becomes an approved project version.
Read the platform guidance How it works
A clearer path from research brief to final document.
Define the study
Start with a topic, brief or existing document. Review and approve the study specification before major drafting begins.
Build the connected work
Add evidence, data, analysis, writing instructions and requirement profiles to the same project context.
Review and export
Resolve quality issues, inspect the final document and export the reviewed version with the relevant evidence retained.
Start with a connected project
Build research that stays coherent from the first idea to the final document.
Create the research context once, then use it across evidence, analysis, writing, review and export.